Light at the End of the Tunnel

The End is NEAR! No, the apocalyptic type, though were not that far off.... I'm saying of philosophy class! My paper is done and proof read and rearranged, (thanks Ki) polished and looking good. TODAY is the final. *gasp* and then it's over. I wonder if my teacher will choke on my paper or just dismantle it without response for his own pleasure. *meh*

The glorious gem of research and argument is showing how evolution should be kept as a hypothesis being worked on because of all the scientific criticisms and gaps. This is an important first part because the rest shows how we are being force fed something incomplete as fact that also represses free inquiry and the pursuit of viable options. Scientists supporting intelligent design conform to the rules of science. I'm talking about scientists who do legitimate research who conclude that only an intelligent designer could have produced this out come.

Pushing evolution as complete fact rejects other options and allows a hostile atmosphere against anyone who questions it. Science is stiff arming people into "consensus". When was truth established by democracy instead of facts and evidence? Although the paper deals with evolution the idea is seen in things like global warming, which causes all sorts of idiocracy.

Take ethanol. It takes gasoline to produce, does nearly nothing to reduce price, takes away space for food crops, etc. By the way several countries are facing starvation, any connection? I think so. Making the world green should be done though innovation not legislation.

Any hoot, there is probably a movie review and game review above this, or that's the plan... enjoy!